New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000199
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 17:48
Participant: Alexander
Car: Ford Mondeo
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 669 / 1000
Tonal balance182 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity131 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape138 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics94 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour88 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness36 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.1 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
92.1 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −17.3 dB)
Dip in the region
3.15 – 8 kHz (up to −5.8 dB)
Strong bass excess
100 – 160 Hz (up to +6.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −5.5 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.4 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.0 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −5.7 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity60.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)65.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)88.0 %
Dynamic similarity62.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)36.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score669 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +7…8 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
High: 3.15 – 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 5 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.3
Low: 100 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 500 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 1.6 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 315 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the highs and sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.651
Track start in the recording2.41 s
Compared segment2:11
Correlation0.566
Peak sharpness (PSR)225.3
Clock drift+21.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−52.1 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio35.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.70Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−0.9 dB
Recording fileЗапись – 20261109-2045.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−14.7
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−11.7
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−17.0 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB16.4 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.8 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB11.1 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance92.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges60.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz65.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor62.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time88.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz36.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination669 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −5.5 dB · noticeable, match 40%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.0 dB · small, match 84%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −5.7 dB · noticeable, match 39%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.8 dB
RMS L / R−18.6 / −15.8 dB
Peak L / R−2.3 / −0.6 dB
L/R correlation0.627
L/R delay+0.36 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −15.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −3.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +5.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.9 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −5.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −3.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility 0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −4.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.9 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −3.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −5.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −3.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −9.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −13.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −26.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.