New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000030
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 07.11.2026 16:55
Car: зштлфзштлффф
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 509 / 1000
Tonal balance200 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity86 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape127 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics96 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness0 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.2 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
84.5 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization0 %
Strong background noise — turn off the engine and ventilation, close the windows
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
2.5 – 20 kHz (up to −24.5 dB)
Strong midrange boost
630 – 800 Hz (up to +5.2 dB)
Slight bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +4.8 dB)
High noise in the recording
SNR ≈ 1.8 dB

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.1 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.2 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.1 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −11.1 dB strong dip

Additional metrics

Band similarity66.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)43.1 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity64.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)0.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score509 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 2.5 – 20 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, +7…8 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.5
Mid: 630 – 800 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 630 Hz, −2…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
Mid: 250 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording40.91 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.000
Peak sharpness (PSR)5.3
Clock drift0.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR0 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−16.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio1.8 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−0.1 dB
Recording filehonda-2.mp3

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−12.6
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−0.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−10.8
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−15.0 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB14.1 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB2.7 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB9.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance84.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges66.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz43.1 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor64.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz0.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination509 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.1 dB · small, match 70%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.2 dB · small, match 82%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −11.1 dB · significant, match 16%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+4.0 dB
RMS L / R−13.5 / −17.4 dB
Peak L / R−0.9 / −2.5 dB
L/R correlation0.586
L/R delay−0.27 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+3.9 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −29.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −17.7 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +1.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch 0.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +0.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +4.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −3.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −5.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −13.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −13.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −9.5 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −8.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −7.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −14.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −12.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −75.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.