New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000074
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 10:05
Car: Polo sedan/SQ
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 701 / 1000
Tonal balance212 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity159 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape124 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics48 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour78 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness80 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.7 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
82.8 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization96 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
500 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −6.7 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +7.6 dB)
Strong treble excess
8 – 16 kHz (up to +6.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +4.2 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.7 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.2 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.8 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity70.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)79.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)77.9 %
Dynamic similarity32.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)80.4 %
Stereo stage width118 %
Overall score701 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 500 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.6
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
High: 8 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 10 kHz, −2…5 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Sub: below 63 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 63 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.7

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.350
Track start in the recording3.50 s
Compared segment1:33
Correlation0.501
Peak sharpness (PSR)357.0
Clock drift−2.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR96 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−50.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio35.9 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.71Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+2.2 dB
Recording fileVID20261108125908.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.8−12.3
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.5 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.4−10.3
RMSaverage power−13.9 dB−14.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.9 dB14.3 dB
LRAloudness range10.7 dB4.1 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB9.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance82.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges70.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz79.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor32.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time77.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz80.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination701 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +4.2 dB · noticeable, match 50%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.7 dB · small, match 63%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.2 dB · small, match 82%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.8 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.0 dB
RMS L / R−14.0 / −15.0 dB
Peak L / R−0.2 / −0.4 dB
L/R correlation0.744
L/R delay−0.04 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −5.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −2.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +2.9 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +5.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +2.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +7.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.2 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −6.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −5.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack 0.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity 0.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +3.2 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +5.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −61.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.