New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000264
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь, гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 10.11.2026 07:57
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 686 / 1000
Tonal balance191 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity172 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape137 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics54 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour79 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness53 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.7 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
91.3 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −12.9 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 63 Hz (up to −12.4 dB)
Strong bass excess
100 – 160 Hz (up to +5.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −9.7 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.9 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −3.2 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity63.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)85.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)78.7 %
Dynamic similarity35.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)53.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score686 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7
Low: 100 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −2…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Mid: 500 – 800 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 630 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.852
Track start in the recording3.23 s
Compared segment2:02
Correlation0.512
Peak sharpness (PSR)43.1
Clock drift+28.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−59.0 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio40.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.62Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.0 dB
Recording fileRecording_24.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−16.0
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−2.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−2.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−13.4
RMSaverage power−13.8 dB−18.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.8 dB15.9 dB
LRAloudness range11.0 dB5.9 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB10.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance91.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges63.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz85.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor35.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time78.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz53.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination686 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −9.7 dB · significant, match 20%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.7 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −3.2 dB · noticeable, match 58%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.2 dB
RMS L / R−18.7 / −18.6 dB
Peak L / R−3.0 / −2.8 dB
L/R correlation0.407
L/R delay+0.40 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −16.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −16.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −13.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −6.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −4.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +3.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.2 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.3 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −9.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −17.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.