New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000186
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 16:07
Participant: Дмитрий
Car: F7x
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 332 / 1000
Tonal balance158 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity128 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape0 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics44 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness2 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
−0.8 dB
(compressed)
Spectral similarity
0.0 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics compressed
DR −0.8 vs 11.0 dB in the original
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −15.4 dB)
Strong midrange boost
2.5 – 5 kHz (up to +8.2 dB)
Dip in the region
400 – 630 Hz (up to −6.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −13.5 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −4.9 dB reduced
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.4 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.8 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity52.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity29.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)2.1 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score332 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +8…9 dB, Q = 0.7
High: 2.5 – 5 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 4 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.6
Mid: 400 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 500 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
High: 10 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 12 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 1 – 1.25 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 400 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The sound differs substantially from the original. Check speaker wiring and polarity, crossover and EQ settings, then measure again.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording0.57 s
Compared segment0:44
Correlation0.247
Peak sharpness (PSR)26.7
Clock drift+34.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−51.6 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+28.8 dB
Recording fileШум.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−38.5
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−16.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−16.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−27.5
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−43.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB26.7 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB1.3 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB−0.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance0.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges52.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor29.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz2.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination332 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −13.5 dB · significant, match 10%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −4.9 dB · noticeable, match 44%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.8 dB · small, match 62%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −22.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −19.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −14.9 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −12.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −15.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −6.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +0.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −4.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −4.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −6.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +3.7 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +8.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +4.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +2.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −81.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.