New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000113
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 08.11.2026 20:54
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 652 / 1000
Tonal balance209 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity139 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape49 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics130 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour53 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness72 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
32.8 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −8.2 dB)
Dip in the region
800 Hz – 2 kHz (up to −6.6 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 100 Hz (up to −3.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.3 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −2.6 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.4 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity69.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)69.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)52.6 %
Dynamic similarity86.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)71.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score652 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Mid: 800 Hz – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Low: below 100 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 100 Hz, +2…3 dB, Q = 0.7
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7

Check the crossovers and phase at 800 Hz – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.351
Track start in the recording0.98 s
Compared segment0:44
Correlation0.132
Peak sharpness (PSR)63.4
Clock drift+25.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−13.3 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−3.3 dB
Recording file20261108_235008.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−9.1
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−0.4 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−9.0
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−12.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB12.5 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.1 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB9.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance32.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges69.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz69.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor86.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time52.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz71.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination652 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.3 dB · noticeable, match 57%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −2.6 dB · small, match 65%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.4 dB · small, match 67%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.0 dB
RMS L / R−14.7 / −11.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −0.4 dB
L/R correlation0.472
L/R delay+0.36 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −13.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −4.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −2.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −2.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −1.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −4.8 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body 0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −4.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −5.6 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak 0.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.1 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −6.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −4.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −10.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.