New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000151
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 09:29
Participant: Андрей Lepilla кустом
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 798 / 1000
Tonal balance251 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity145 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape141 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics130 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour95 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness36 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
94.2 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Slight dip
800 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −4.8 dB)
Slight bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +4.4 dB)
Slight midrange boost
250 – 500 Hz (up to +4.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.0 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.1 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.4 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.8 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity83.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)72.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)94.5 %
Dynamic similarity86.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)36.3 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score798 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 800 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +2…5 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Mid: 250 – 500 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Mid: 1.6 – 2.5 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 2 kHz, −2…3 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2

Check the crossovers and phase at 800 Hz – 1.25 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.451
Track start in the recording1.18 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.526
Peak sharpness (PSR)103.8
Clock drift+18.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−29.0 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.17Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.3 dB
Recording file20261109_122624.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−15.4
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−12.0
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−17.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB17.1 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB6.3 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB11.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance94.2 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges83.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz72.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor86.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time94.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz36.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination798 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.0 dB · small, match 71%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.8 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.8 dB
RMS L / R−19.4 / −16.6 dB
Peak L / R−1.7 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.690
L/R delay+0.23 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −5.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −3.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +1.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +4.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility 0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +3.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.2 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −3.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.6 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +0.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −2.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.