New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000366
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 17:34
Participant: Blink
Car: Polo
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 856 / 1000
Tonal balance264 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity167 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape138 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics101 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour95 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness91 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.2 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
92.1 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization96 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +5.3 dB)
Slight treble excess
8 – 12 kHz (up to +4.0 dB)
Slight dip
500 – 800 Hz (up to −4.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.3 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.3 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.1 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.6 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity88.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)83.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)94.6 %
Dynamic similarity67.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)90.5 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score856 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7
High: 8 – 12 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 10 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
Mid: 500 – 800 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
Mid: 3.15 – 4 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, −2…3 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0
Summary
The system sounds very close to the original. No significant correction is needed, only fine-tuning by ear.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording2.73 s
Compared segment1:34
Correlation0.503
Peak sharpness (PSR)367.7
Clock drift−4.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR96 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−51.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio35.4 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.45Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−1.7 dB
Recording fileVID20261110202033.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.2−13.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−11.0
RMSaverage power−17.5 dB−16.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.5 dB16.0 dB
LRAloudness range6.2 dB4.6 dB
DRdynamic range12.1 dB11.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance92.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges88.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz83.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor67.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time94.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz90.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination856 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.3 dB · small, match 68%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.3 dB
RMS L / R−16.2 / −15.9 dB
Peak L / R−0.3 / −0.0 dB
L/R correlation0.575
L/R delay+0.34 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.2 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −8.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −2.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −2.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −2.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −4.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence 0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.6 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.2 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +3.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.4 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +1.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +3.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +3.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.6 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −56.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.