New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000352
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 14:38
Participant: Negoday
Car: Lc200
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 679 / 1000
Tonal balance202 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity106 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape92 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics115 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness68 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.8 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
61.3 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
1.25 – 5 kHz (up to −9.6 dB)
Strong treble excess
6.3 – 12 kHz (up to +13.6 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 500 Hz (up to +5.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +5.6 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.5 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.1 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.5 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity67.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)53.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.2 %
Dynamic similarity76.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)68.3 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score679 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 1.25 – 5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2.5 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.8
High: 6.3 – 12 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 8 kHz, −6…12 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Mid: 200 – 500 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.3
Low: 63 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.620
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.207
Peak sharpness (PSR)96.0
Clock drift+21.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−29.1 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: +0.05Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.0 dB
Recording fileRecord-12.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−13.8
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB−1.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.5 dBTP−1.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.0−10.8
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−16.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.1 dB14.7 dB
LRAloudness range8.5 dB9.3 dB
DRdynamic range7.2 dB8.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance61.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges67.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz53.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor76.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz68.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination679 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +5.6 dB · noticeable, match 39%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.5 dB · small, match 65%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 98%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.5 dB · small, match 66%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +7.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +6.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +7.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.3 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +4.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +3.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +3.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence 0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −7.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −4.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −6.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −6.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.8 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +10.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +12.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +2.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +7.1 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.