New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000304
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 12:03
Participant: Gr
Car: Rapid
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 622 / 1000
Tonal balance182 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity121 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape120 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics73 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour80 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness46 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.6 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
79.9 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
50 – 160 Hz (up to +13.2 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 630 Hz (up to +8.1 dB)
Strong midrange boost
2.5 – 4 kHz (up to +6.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.6 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +8.2 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz +2.2 dB slightly higher
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.4 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity60.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)60.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)79.5 %
Dynamic similarity48.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)46.3 %
Stereo stage width143 %
Overall score622 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 50 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −6…12 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Mid: 200 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 400 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
Mid: 1 – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.25 kHz, +2…5 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2

Check the crossovers and phase at 1 – 1.25 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.454
Track start in the recording1.12 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.460
Peak sharpness (PSR)57.5
Clock drift−66.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−23.3 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.83Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.4 dB
Recording fileIMG_7831.mov

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−13.1
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.5 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−11.2
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−14.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB14.3 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.3 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB9.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance79.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges60.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz60.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor48.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time79.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz46.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination622 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.6 dB · noticeable, match 55%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +8.2 dB · significant, match 25%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +2.2 dB · small, match 70%
The sound is forward, “in your face”, and may be fatiguing.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+4.6 dB
RMS L / R−13.0 / −17.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.5 / −1.6 dB
L/R correlation0.864
L/R delay+0.27 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+4.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +0.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −9.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −9.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +8.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +12.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +13.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +11.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +5.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +6.2 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +7.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +7.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +5.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −4.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.8 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +6.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +3.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −3.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +2.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.