New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000039
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 19:37
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 794 / 1000
Tonal balance244 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity141 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape127 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics118 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour97 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness67 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
84.5 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong treble excess
4 – 8 kHz (up to +7.7 dB)
Dip in the region
160 – 250 Hz (up to −8.0 dB)
Slight dip
2.5 – 3.15 kHz (up to −4.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +1.4 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.4 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.1 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.2 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity81.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)70.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.9 %
Dynamic similarity78.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)66.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score794 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 4 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Low: 160 – 250 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Mid: 2.5 – 3.15 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2.5 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Mid: 500 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 630 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 3.15 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 160 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.753
Track start in the recording2.41 s
Compared segment3:57
Correlation0.245
Peak sharpness (PSR)81.1
Clock drift+24.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−51.9 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio35.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: +0.05Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.5 dB
Recording file20261107_223030.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−13.3
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−10.1
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−16.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB15.6 dB
LRAloudness range9.5 dB9.8 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB9.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance84.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges81.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz70.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor78.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz66.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination794 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.2 dB · small, match 69%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.7 dB
RMS L / R−18.5 / −14.8 dB
Peak L / R−1.1 / −0.8 dB
L/R correlation0.493
L/R delay+0.31 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −3.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +0.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +1.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.9 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −1.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +0.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −2.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −6.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −1.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body 0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +2.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.2 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +6.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +6.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +5.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −8.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.