New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000353
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 14:39
Car: VW
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 710 / 1000
Tonal balance224 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity153 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape133 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics99 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour85 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness16 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
88.7 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
63 – 125 Hz (up to +7.3 dB)
Dip in the region
315 – 630 Hz (up to −8.0 dB)
Strong midrange boost
630 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to +8.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.3 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.9 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −3.0 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity74.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)76.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)84.6 %
Dynamic similarity65.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)15.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score710 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 63 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Mid: 630 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)

A dip at 315 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass and highs for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.452
Track start in the recording2.12 s
Compared segment2:10
Correlation0.350
Peak sharpness (PSR)217.1
Clock drift−30.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−69.2 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio52.0 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.79Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+2.0 dB
Recording fileНовая запись 9.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.3−15.4
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−12.9
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−17.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.7 dB16.6 dB
LRAloudness range5.9 dB3.9 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB11.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance88.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges74.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz76.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor65.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time84.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz15.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination710 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.9 dB · noticeable, match 52%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −3.0 dB · noticeable, match 61%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.3 dB
RMS L / R−16.6 / −18.0 dB
Peak L / R−0.7 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.346
L/R delay+0.48 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −10.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −6.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −1.5 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.8 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +6.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +5.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −4.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +4.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.2 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.2 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −5.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −6.6 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.9 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +5.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +5.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack 0.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −5.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −4.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.