New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000179
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 15:02
Participant: Technotuning
Car: Subaru Forester Sh
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 628 / 1000
Tonal balance161 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity144 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape102 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics60 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour87 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness74 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
68.1 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong treble excess
above 10 kHz (up to +15.2 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +9.7 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
below 63 Hz (up to +11.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +8.2 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +4.7 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +3.2 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity53.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)72.1 %
SPL (loudness contour)87.0 %
Dynamic similarity40.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)74.5 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score628 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 10 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 10 kHz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.7
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.6
Sub: below 63 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 63 Hz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 500 Hz – 1.6 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass, highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.552
Track start in the recording8.35 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.369
Peak sharpness (PSR)54.5
Clock drift+23.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−72.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio49.2 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.33Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+13.1 dB
Recording file20261109_175915.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−21.1
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−5.5 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−5.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−19.0
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−23.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB17.5 dB
LRAloudness range10.8 dB7.3 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB11.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance68.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges53.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz72.1 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor40.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time87.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz74.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination628 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +8.2 dB · significant, match 25%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +4.7 dB · noticeable, match 46%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.0 dB · excellent, match 85%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +3.2 dB · noticeable, match 59%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +2.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +6.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +10.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +7.4 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +9.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +4.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −5.2 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +2.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +4.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +14.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +14.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.