New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000205
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 19:03
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 693 / 1000
Tonal balance197 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity139 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape136 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics87 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour86 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness48 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.2 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
90.8 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 315 Hz (up to +9.7 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −8.3 dB)
Dip in the region
2.5 – 4 kHz (up to −5.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.9 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +6.4 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.8 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.8 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity65.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)69.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)86.0 %
Dynamic similarity58.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)47.8 %
Stereo stage width96 %
Overall score693 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 315 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.5
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
High: 4 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.450
Track start in the recording2.12 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.527
Peak sharpness (PSR)593.7
Clock drift+2.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−57.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio35.8 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.68Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.4 dB
Recording file20261109_215231.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−20.4
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−3.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−3.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.3
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−21.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB18.7 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.0 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges65.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz69.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor58.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time86.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz47.8 %
Overall scoreweighted combination693 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.9 dB · noticeable, match 52%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +6.4 dB · significant, match 34%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.8 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.8 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.0 dB
RMS L / R−21.3 / −22.4 dB
Peak L / R−3.2 / −3.2 dB
L/R correlation0.888
L/R delay+0.14 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −2.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −0.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +8.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +6.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +9.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +8.8 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +6.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +5.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body 0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.6 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −4.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.8 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +2.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +1.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −4.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −5.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −10.1 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.