New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000110
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 20:43
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 734 / 1000
Tonal balance215 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity138 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape135 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics101 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness49 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.0 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
90.0 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
800 Hz – 1.6 kHz (up to −7.4 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 100 Hz (up to −4.9 dB)
Dip in the region
125 – 250 Hz (up to −5.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.6 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −2.5 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.9 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.3 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity71.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)68.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)95.6 %
Dynamic similarity67.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)48.9 %
Stereo stage width129 %
Overall score734 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 800 Hz – 1.6 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Low: below 100 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 100 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.7
Low: 125 – 250 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)

Check the crossovers and phase at 800 Hz – 1.6 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 125 – 250 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.353
Track start in the recording1.59 s
Compared segment3:58
Correlation0.285
Peak sharpness (PSR)73.1
Clock drift+27.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−48.9 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio34.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.17Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−0.2 dB
Recording file20261108_233806.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−11.6
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−0.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−9.1
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−14.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB13.9 dB
LRAloudness range9.6 dB7.6 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB9.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges71.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz68.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor67.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time95.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz48.9 %
Overall scoreweighted combination734 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.6 dB · noticeable, match 55%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −2.5 dB · small, match 66%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.3 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.9 dB
RMS L / R−15.7 / −13.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.585
L/R delay+0.29 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −8.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −2.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −2.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −3.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −2.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch 0.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −2.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −4.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −5.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −5.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity 0.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −3.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −4.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.