New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000287
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 11:04
Participant: Андрей Lepilla кустом
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 695 / 1000
Tonal balance239 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity136 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape118 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics55 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour77 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness70 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.4 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
78.6 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong midrange boost
160 – 800 Hz (up to +12.3 dB)
Dip in the region
800 Hz – 4 kHz (up to −6.3 dB)
Slight treble excess
6.3 – 8 kHz (up to +3.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.0 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.4 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +1.9 dB slightly higher
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.3 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity79.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)68.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)76.9 %
Dynamic similarity36.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)70.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score695 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 160 – 800 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 400 Hz, −5…10 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.7
Mid: 800 Hz – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.7
High: 6.3 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.818
Track start in the recording0.25 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.526
Peak sharpness (PSR)55.1
Clock drift+25.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−22.5 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.93Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.6 dB
Recording file20261110_135503.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−13.2
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB−0.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.5 dBTP−0.5 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.0−10.8
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−15.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.1 dB14.9 dB
LRAloudness range8.5 dB3.4 dB
DRdynamic range7.2 dB10.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance78.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges79.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz68.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor36.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time76.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz70.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination695 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.0 dB · small, match 72%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +1.9 dB · small, match 73%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.6 dB
RMS L / R−17.1 / −14.6 dB
Peak L / R−1.0 / −0.8 dB
L/R correlation0.622
L/R delay+0.35 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +0.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +2.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +1.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +6.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +12.2 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +7.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +9.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +6.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +6.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.8 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −4.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −3.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance 0.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +2.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −0.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −4.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.