New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000290
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 11:20
Participant: Андрей Lepilla кустом
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 858 / 1000
Tonal balance296 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity174 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape136 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics82 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour98 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness72 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
90.7 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Slight bass excess
63 – 100 Hz (up to +3.5 dB)
Dip in the region
125 – 200 Hz (up to −6.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −0.0 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.1 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.1 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.2 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity98.5 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)87.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)97.8 %
Dynamic similarity54.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)72.1 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score858 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 63 – 100 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds very close to the original. No significant correction is needed, only fine-tuning by ear.
Recommended
correction
2 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.452
Track start in the recording1.11 s
Compared segment2:01
Correlation0.574
Peak sharpness (PSR)44.0
Clock drift+26.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−26.9 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.30Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.0 dB
Recording file20261110_141803.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−13.3
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB−0.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.5 dBTP−0.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.0−10.7
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−16.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.1 dB15.7 dB
LRAloudness range8.6 dB6.2 dB
DRdynamic range7.2 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges98.5 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz87.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor54.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time97.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz72.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination858 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −0.0 dB · excellent, match 100%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 97%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.8 dB
RMS L / R−18.1 / −15.2 dB
Peak L / R−1.1 / −0.8 dB
L/R correlation0.436
L/R delay+0.27 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −3.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −3.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +0.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +3.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +1.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −6.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.2 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.8 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity 0.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +1.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +0.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −4.1 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.