New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000197
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 17:38
Participant: Alexander
Car: Ford Mondeo
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 646 / 1000
Tonal balance189 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity146 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape140 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics87 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour82 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness2 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
93.5 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization61 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
100 – 315 Hz (up to +9.0 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −17.8 dB)
Slight dip
3.15 – 5 kHz (up to −4.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.6 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +4.3 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.1 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −4.0 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity63.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)73.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)81.6 %
Dynamic similarity57.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)2.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score646 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 100 – 315 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.8
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +6…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
High: 3.15 – 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 4 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Low: 63 – 80 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

Check the crossovers and phase at 3.15 – 5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, highs, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.550
Track start in the recording3.31 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.201
Peak sharpness (PSR)29.6
Clock drift0.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR61 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−47.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio31.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.84Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+0.6 dB
Recording fileЗапись – 20261109-2034.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−13.8
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−11.1
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−15.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB15.9 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.5 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance93.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges63.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz73.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor57.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time81.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz2.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination646 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.6 dB · noticeable, match 55%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +4.3 dB · noticeable, match 48%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.1 dB · excellent, match 98%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −4.0 dB · noticeable, match 51%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.9 dB
RMS L / R−16.9 / −15.0 dB
Peak L / R−1.7 / 0.1 dB
L/R correlation0.726
L/R delay+0.27 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −10.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −13.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −6.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −1.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +7.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +4.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −3.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.9 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −3.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −4.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −6.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −12.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −28.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.