New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000276
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 09:50
Participant: Jcd
Car: —
Microphone: Phone + external microphone
Overall quality
Total: 575 / 1000
Tonal balance140 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity148 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape115 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics73 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour80 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness19 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.0 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
76.3 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 200 Hz (up to +13.3 dB)
Dip in the region
400 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −7.5 dB)
Strong treble excess
12 – 16 kHz (up to +5.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +12.4 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +7.7 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.8 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.0 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity46.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)74.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)79.9 %
Dynamic similarity48.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)18.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score575 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 200 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 200 Hz, −6…12 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 400 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
High: 12 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 16 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
High: 3.15 – 4 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 4 kHz, −2…3 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.456
Track start in the recording3.30 s
Compared segment2:11
Correlation0.439
Peak sharpness (PSR)62.0
Clock drift−91.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−60.0 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio32.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.56Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+16.7 dB
Recording filePXL_20261110_094439313~2.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−27.3
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−4.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−4.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−24.6
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−27.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB22.6 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB3.9 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB13.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance76.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges46.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz74.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor48.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time79.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz18.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination575 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +12.4 dB · significant, match 13%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +7.7 dB · significant, match 28%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.8 dB · small, match 74%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.0 dB · small, match 72%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+65.6 dB
RMS L / R−24.5 / −90.2 dB
Peak L / R−4.9 / −74.5 dB
L/R correlation0.020
L/R delay0.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+65.7 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +11.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +14.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +13.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +11.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +8.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +11.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +10.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +5.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −6.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −5.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −3.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +2.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +3.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance 0.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +5.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −52.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.