New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000295
LogicVer = 1
Graham Blvd
After Dark
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:47
Date: 10.11.2026 11:38
Participant: Андрей Lepilla кустом
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 803 / 1000
Tonal balance251 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity155 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape141 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics124 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour78 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness54 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.6 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
94.0 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
63 – 100 Hz (up to +5.6 dB)
Slight midrange boost
200 – 315 Hz (up to +4.8 dB)
Slight dip
125 – 200 Hz (up to −3.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +1.5 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.9 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +1.3 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity83.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)77.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)78.2 %
Dynamic similarity82.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)54.0 %
Stereo stage width130 %
Overall score803 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 63 – 100 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Mid: 200 – 315 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +2…3 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7
High: 6.3 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 8 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.351
Track start in the recording0.71 s
Compared segment2:02
Correlation0.517
Peak sharpness (PSR)72.5
Clock drift+22.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−16.3 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+4.2 dB
Recording file20261110_143549.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.4−12.0
Peakmax sample level−0.4 dB−0.4 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction1.0 dBTP−0.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−6.9−9.9
RMSaverage power−11.4 dB−13.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average11.0 dB13.2 dB
LRAloudness range3.5 dB3.5 dB
DRdynamic range6.9 dB8.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance94.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges83.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz77.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor82.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time78.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz54.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination803 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +1.5 dB · small, match 77%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.6 dB · excellent, match 91%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +1.3 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.2 dB
RMS L / R−13.5 / −13.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −0.4 dB
L/R correlation0.571
L/R delay+0.29 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.8 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −6.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −3.5 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +2.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −2.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −2.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −2.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.6 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.1 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +3.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +2.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.