New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000325
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 12:46
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 703 / 1000
Tonal balance236 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity178 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape34 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics129 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness30 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.7 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
22.9 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization91 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
50 – 125 Hz (up to +6.0 dB)
Strong treble excess
12 – 16 kHz (up to +6.5 dB)
Dip in the region
160 – 200 Hz (up to −5.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −2.6 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.1 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.1 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +1.2 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity78.8 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)88.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.5 %
Dynamic similarity86.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)30.3 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score703 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 50 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
High: 12 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 16 kHz, −4…6 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Low: 160 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
Mid: 250 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording3.67 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.395
Peak sharpness (PSR)115.6
Clock drift+36.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR91 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−50.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio29.0 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.0 dB
Recording fileГолос 261110_144533.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−18.1
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−6.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−5.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−17.8
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−21.6 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB15.4 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.4 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance22.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges78.8 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz88.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor86.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz30.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination703 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −2.6 dB · small, match 65%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.1 dB · small, match 70%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.1 dB · excellent, match 98%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +1.2 dB · small, match 82%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.2 dB
RMS L / R−23.5 / −20.3 dB
Peak L / R−9.5 / −6.2 dB
L/R correlation0.477
L/R delay+0.43 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.3 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −28.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −17.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.6 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.2 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.3 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.7 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.7 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +4.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +4.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −7.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.