New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000081
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 11:13
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 351 / 1000
Tonal balance132 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity126 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape68 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics21 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour4 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness0 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
45.1 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization0 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
Low synchronization confidence — check the track and record it again in full

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 200 Hz (up to +17.3 dB)
Dip in the region
500 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −12.4 dB)
Strong treble excess
above 10 kHz (up to +13.6 dB)
Synchronization
low confidence — the result is approximate

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +13.2 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +6.1 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.6 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +3.9 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity44.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)4.1 %
Dynamic similarity14.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)0.2 %
Stereo stage width58 %
Overall score351 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 200 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 200 Hz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 500 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
High: above 10 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 10 kHz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 200 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.6

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs substantially from the original. Check speaker wiring and polarity, crossover and EQ settings, then measure again.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original1:19.141
Track start in the recording1.45 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.000
Peak sharpness (PSR)5.8
Clock drift0.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR0 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−17.5 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −1.00Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.4 dB
Recording fileVID20261108145811.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.2−14.9
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−1.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−1.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−14.4
RMSaverage power−12.3 dB−15.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average12.3 dB14.8 dB
LRAloudness range11.0 dB0.6 dB
DRdynamic range8.0 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance45.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges44.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor14.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time4.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz0.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination351 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +13.2 dB · significant, match 11%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +6.1 dB · significant, match 36%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.6 dB · small, match 77%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +3.9 dB · noticeable, match 52%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.0 dB
RMS L / R−15.4 / −16.5 dB
Peak L / R−1.1 / −2.8 dB
L/R correlation0.890
L/R delay−0.23 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.6 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −1.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +9.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +14.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +12.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +8.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +10.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +10.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +4.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +10.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +5.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −9.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −7.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −5.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.8 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −8.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.9 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −3.2 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +5.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +5.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +13.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −72.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.