New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000185
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 16:06
Participant: Дмитрий
Car: F7x
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 584 / 1000
Tonal balance164 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity128 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape86 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics103 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour86 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness17 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
57.1 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 80 Hz (up to −14.6 dB)
Strong midrange boost
2.5 – 5 kHz (up to +7.4 dB)
Dip in the region
315 – 630 Hz (up to −5.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −12.4 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −4.4 dB reduced
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.7 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity54.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)63.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)86.2 %
Dynamic similarity68.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)16.7 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score584 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 80 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 80 Hz, +7…8 dB, Q = 0.7
High: 2.5 – 5 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 4 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Low: 125 – 250 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9

A dip at 315 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.960
Track start in the recording1.15 s
Compared segment1:56
Correlation0.386
Peak sharpness (PSR)83.2
Clock drift−6.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−49.5 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.04Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+18.4 dB
Recording fileГармоника.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−27.3
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−13.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−13.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−23.6
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−31.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB17.6 dB
LRAloudness range11.0 dB11.3 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance57.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges54.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz63.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor68.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time86.2 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz16.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination584 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −12.4 dB · significant, match 13%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −4.4 dB · noticeable, match 48%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.3 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.7 dB · small, match 64%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −1.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −6.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −15.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −9.7 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −12.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −6.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +0.8 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −0.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −4.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.8 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −1.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −1.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −5.5 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −4.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.9 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +5.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +1.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.8 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.4 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +2.7 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +6.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +7.4 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +5.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer 0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +3.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +1.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −56.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.