New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000282
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 10:37
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 554 / 1000
Tonal balance164 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity95 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape118 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics85 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour77 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness15 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.2 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
78.8 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
below 160 Hz (up to +14.2 dB)
Dip in the region
1.6 – 4 kHz (up to −8.8 dB)
Dip in the region
6.3 – 12 kHz (up to −13.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.5 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +7.3 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.4 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.4 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity54.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)47.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)76.7 %
Dynamic similarity56.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)14.9 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score554 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 160 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 160 Hz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 1.6 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2.5 kHz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.2
High: 6.3 – 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 8 kHz, +6…7 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3
High: 5 – 6.3 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 6.3 kHz, −2…3 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.452
Track start in the recording4.12 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.339
Peak sharpness (PSR)575.8
Clock drift−22.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−40.2 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio20.0 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.72Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.3 dB
Recording fileГолос 006.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−19.0
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.2
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−20.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB17.3 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB2.7 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB13.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance78.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges54.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz47.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor56.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time76.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz14.9 %
Overall scoreweighted combination554 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.5 dB · noticeable, match 55%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +7.3 dB · significant, match 30%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.4 dB · small, match 67%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.4 dB · small, match 67%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −5.0 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −4.7 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +1.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +5.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +6.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +13.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +13.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.2 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −3.4 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.6 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −9.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −7.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −7.6 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −6.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −1.5 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +2.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −13.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −7.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +0.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −20.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.