New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000209
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 19:13
Participant: Артем Степанов
Car: Ларгус тест
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 559 / 1000
Tonal balance192 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity131 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape140 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics26 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour68 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness2 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.8 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
93.3 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization85 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
Noticeable background noise

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
2 – 10 kHz (up to −9.9 dB)
Strong bass excess
40 – 125 Hz (up to +6.5 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 400 Hz (up to +5.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +3.1 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.2 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.4 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −5.0 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity64.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)65.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)68.0 %
Dynamic similarity17.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)1.6 %
Stereo stage width126 %
Overall score559 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 2 – 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 5 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6
Low: 40 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
Mid: 200 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −2…5 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Mid: 630 Hz – 1 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 800 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.9 – 2.9

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs, mid-bass, sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.265
Track start in the recording2.95 s
Compared segment1:48
Correlation0.239
Peak sharpness (PSR)18.7
Clock drift−284.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR85 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−30.2 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio15.0 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.83Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+4.0 dB
Recording file20260525_162246.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.7−13.2
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB0.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−11.5
RMSaverage power−14.0 dB−15.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.0 dB15.2 dB
LRAloudness range12.3 dB2.3 dB
DRdynamic range8.1 dB10.8 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance93.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges64.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz65.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor17.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time68.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz1.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination559 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +3.1 dB · noticeable, match 60%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.2 dB · noticeable, match 59%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −5.0 dB · noticeable, match 44%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.2 dB
RMS L / R−16.4 / −14.2 dB
Peak L / R−0.2 / 0.0 dB
L/R correlation0.708
L/R delay−0.15 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−2.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −0.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −0.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +6.5 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.8 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.9 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +5.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +0.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −3.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility 0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +4.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +3.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.7 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.1 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −3.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −3.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −8.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −9.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.4 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −11.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.