New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000231
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 21:09
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 799 / 1000
Tonal balance221 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity148 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape142 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics108 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour93 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness87 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
13.9 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
94.3 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 125 Hz (up to +8.2 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −7.1 dB)
Slight dip
2.5 – 4 kHz (up to −4.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.5 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.1 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.6 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.4 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity73.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)74.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)92.8 %
Dynamic similarity71.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)87.4 %
Stereo stage width111 %
Overall score799 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Mid: 1 – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.450
Track start in the recording2.19 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.385
Peak sharpness (PSR)340.7
Clock drift−4.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−58.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio36.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.35Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.7 dB
Recording file20261110_000508.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−20.4
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−3.3 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−3.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.9
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−21.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB18.6 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.2 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB13.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance94.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges73.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz74.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor71.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time92.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz87.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination799 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.5 dB · small, match 66%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.1 dB · noticeable, match 60%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.6 dB · excellent, match 90%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.4 dB · small, match 79%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.0 dB
RMS L / R−21.4 / −22.4 dB
Peak L / R−3.3 / −3.3 dB
L/R correlation0.851
L/R delay+0.14 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −4.5 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −4.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −2.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +7.4 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +5.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +6.9 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.9 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity 0.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.7 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +2.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −4.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −10.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.