New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000187
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 16:08
Participant: Дмитрий
Car: F7x
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 582 / 1000
Tonal balance157 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity143 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape81 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics90 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour87 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness24 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
15.0 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
53.8 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 100 Hz (up to −17.2 dB)
Strong midrange boost
2.5 – 5 kHz (up to +7.7 dB)
Dip in the region
125 – 200 Hz (up to −7.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −15.0 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −6.2 dB strong dip
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.4 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +2.0 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity52.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)71.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)86.9 %
Dynamic similarity60.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)24.5 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score582 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 100 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 100 Hz, +8…9 dB, Q = 0.7
High: 2.5 – 5 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 4 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 400 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.450
Track start in the recording0.55 s
Compared segment1:55
Correlation0.256
Peak sharpness (PSR)119.0
Clock drift−4.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−53.1 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.01Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+15.4 dB
Recording fileChen.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.2−31.1
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−14.4 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−14.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−27.6
RMSaverage power−17.6 dB−35.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.6 dB20.9 dB
LRAloudness range5.9 dB7.3 dB
DRdynamic range12.1 dB15.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance53.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges52.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz71.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor60.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time86.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz24.5 %
Overall scoreweighted combination582 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −15.0 dB · significant, match 8%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −6.2 dB · significant, match 36%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +2.0 dB · small, match 72%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −1.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.9 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −17.7 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −12.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −15.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −8.9 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −1.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −2.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −4.8 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −0.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body 0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −3.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −4.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.5 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.6 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.7 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +7.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +1.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −54.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.