New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000285
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 10:42
Participant: LS
Car: GL81
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 767 / 1000
Tonal balance243 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity109 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape123 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics136 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour90 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness66 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.3 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
81.7 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
Noticeable background noise

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
315 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −11.0 dB)
Strong midrange boost
1.25 – 2.5 kHz (up to +7.4 dB)
Slight dip
125 – 160 Hz (up to −4.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.3 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.8 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.9 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.3 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity80.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)54.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)89.8 %
Dynamic similarity90.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)66.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score767 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 315 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.8
Mid: 1.25 – 2.5 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 2 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
Low: 125 – 160 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +2…5 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Low: 50 – 80 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, +3…4 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

A dip at 125 – 160 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.252
Track start in the recording3.44 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.121
Peak sharpness (PSR)102.5
Clock drift−25.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−28.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio11.4 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.13Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median−0.4 dB
Recording filevideo_20261110_184121.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−14.5
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB0.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP0.3 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−10.0
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−17.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB17.6 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB6.3 dB
DRdynamic range12.3 dB12.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance81.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges80.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz54.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor90.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time89.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz66.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination767 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.3 dB · small, match 68%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.8 dB · small, match 74%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.9 dB
RMS L / R−16.5 / −18.4 dB
Peak L / R0.2 / −0.4 dB
L/R correlation0.491
L/R delay−0.36 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+1.9 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +7.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +4.5 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +5.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −4.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +0.8 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −3.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.6 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −2.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −6.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −7.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −9.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +4.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +7.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +2.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −3.1 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −3.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −33.1 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.