New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000236
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 22:22
Participant: ЮРИЙ Ц.
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 741 / 1000
Tonal balance244 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity149 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape135 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics44 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour87 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness82 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.1 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
90.1 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong bass excess
40 – 125 Hz (up to +7.8 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −7.8 dB)
Slight dip
2.5 – 4 kHz (up to −4.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.7 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.8 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.8 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity81.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)74.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)86.5 %
Dynamic similarity29.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)82.1 %
Stereo stage width93 %
Overall score741 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
Mid: 200 – 250 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.350
Track start in the recording3.33 s
Compared segment2:01
Correlation0.151
Peak sharpness (PSR)271.9
Clock drift−7.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−55.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio37.0 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.53Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+7.3 dB
Recording file20261110_011542.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−16.7
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−13.9
RMSaverage power−13.8 dB−18.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.8 dB18.6 dB
LRAloudness range11.0 dB6.1 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB12.1 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance90.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges81.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz74.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor29.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time86.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz82.1 %
Overall scoreweighted combination741 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.8 dB · noticeable, match 53%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.8 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+1.1 dB
RMS L / R−18.1 / −19.3 dB
Peak L / R−0.1 / −0.5 dB
L/R correlation0.794
L/R delay−0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.9 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −10.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −6.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +6.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +5.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +7.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.7 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.4 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body 0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.5 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.7 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.9 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.8 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.9 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −7.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.