New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000243
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 04:23
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 595 / 1000
Tonal balance198 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity161 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape9 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics143 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour27 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness57 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
6.0 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 100 Hz (up to −7.2 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 12 kHz (up to −14.1 dB)
Dip in the region
125 – 200 Hz (up to −7.6 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −6.3 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −3.5 dB reduced
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.5 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity66.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)80.4 %
SPL (loudness contour)26.7 %
Dynamic similarity95.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)56.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score595 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 100 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 100 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +6…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)
Low: 125 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.0
Mid: 1 – 1.25 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A dip at 125 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:18.675
Track start in the recording2.55 s
Compared segment0:26
Correlation0.409
Peak sharpness (PSR)76.3
Clock drift+23.1 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−59.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio34.2 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.2 dB
Recording fileRecording_14.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−20.9
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−10.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−10.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−20.7
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−25.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.3 dB14.5 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.3 dB
DRdynamic range11.1 dB10.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance6.0 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges66.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz80.4 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor95.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time26.7 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz56.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination595 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −6.3 dB · significant, match 35%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −3.5 dB · noticeable, match 56%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.5 dB · small, match 78%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.4 dB
RMS L / R−25.9 / −24.5 dB
Peak L / R−12.2 / −10.6 dB
L/R correlation0.165
L/R delay+0.39 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −10.5 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −7.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −5.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −5.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −5.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −1.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −1.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −3.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.6 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body 0.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.9 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.3 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +2.5 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.2 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +1.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +2.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance 0.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.7 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.5 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.2 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −10.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −23.1 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.