New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000160
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 12:20
Car: Авео т250
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 612 / 1000
Tonal balance190 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity110 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape102 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics98 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour97 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness15 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.4 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
67.9 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −12.6 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
below 63 Hz (up to +14.3 dB)
Strong midrange boost
2.5 – 6.3 kHz (up to +6.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +12.8 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.8 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz 0.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.4 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity63.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)55.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)96.5 %
Dynamic similarity65.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)14.7 %
Stereo stage width93 %
Overall score612 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Sub: below 63 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 63 Hz, −7…12 dB, Q = 0.7
High: 2.5 – 6.3 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 4 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.8 – 1.3
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 800 Hz – 1 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:02.098
Track start in the recording0.35 s
Compared segment1:58
Correlation0.319
Peak sharpness (PSR)33.7
Clock drift+229.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−33.5 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.16Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.0 dB
Recording fileVID_20261109_151709_384.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−18.4
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−3.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−3.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−15.9
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−19.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB16.1 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB9.5 dB
DRdynamic range8.2 dB9.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance67.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges63.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz55.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor65.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time96.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz14.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination612 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +12.8 dB · significant, match 12%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.8 dB · small, match 74%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: 0.0 dB · excellent, match 100%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.4 dB · small, match 67%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.3 dB
RMS L / R−19.7 / −20.0 dB
Peak L / R−3.9 / −3.8 dB
L/R correlation0.791
L/R delay+0.08 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +11.8 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +13.1 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +13.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +11.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +6.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −6.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −4.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −3.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −3.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids 0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −3.1 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.8 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −6.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +1.6 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +2.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +4.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +5.3 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +6.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +4.5 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −6.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −12.0 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −6.1 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −2.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −55.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.