New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000071
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 09:26
Car: Haval F7
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 578 / 1000
Tonal balance150 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity174 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape126 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics35 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour64 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness29 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
6.2 dB
(compressed)
Spectral similarity
83.8 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 5 kHz (up to −61.4 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 400 Hz (up to +6.6 dB)
Dip in the region
400 – 800 Hz (up to −7.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −9.9 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.9 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −7.0 dB strong dip

Additional metrics

Band similarity50.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)86.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)64.1 %
Dynamic similarity23.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)29.0 %
Stereo stage width93 %
Overall score578 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +8…9 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 5 kHz)
Low: 80 – 400 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.7
Mid: 400 – 800 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +4…6 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.5
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.7

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:06.566
Track start in the recording3.45 s
Compared segment3:53
Correlation0.207
Peak sharpness (PSR)367.3
Clock drift+1.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−46.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio34.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.88Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+0.9 dB
Recording fileMP4_20261108_122242VLOG.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−10.0
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−1.4 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−1.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−8.2
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−12.2 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB10.8 dB
LRAloudness range9.0 dB1.4 dB
DRdynamic range7.6 dB6.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance83.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges50.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz86.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor23.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time64.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz29.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination578 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −9.9 dB · significant, match 19%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.9 dB · small, match 61%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −7.0 dB · significant, match 31%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.1 dB
RMS L / R−12.2 / −12.3 dB
Peak L / R−1.4 / −1.9 dB
L/R correlation0.752
L/R delay−0.27 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −13.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −10.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −11.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −8.7 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −3.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.2 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +5.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +4.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +6.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +4.8 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −5.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −6.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −6.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.9 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.9 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance 0.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −4.5 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −4.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −11.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −14.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −14.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −73.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.