New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000245
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 10.11.2026 04:32
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 683 / 1000
Tonal balance225 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity163 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape66 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics147 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour20 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness62 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.2 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
44.3 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization89 %
Strong background noise — turn off the engine and ventilation, close the windows

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 12 kHz (up to −12.9 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 63 Hz (up to −8.3 dB)
Slight midrange boost
1 – 1.25 kHz (up to +3.4 dB)
High noise in the recording
SNR ≈ 0.7 dB

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −6.2 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −0.1 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −2.1 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity75.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)81.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)20.1 %
Dynamic similarity98.2 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)61.9 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score683 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 12 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +6…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 12 kHz)
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 1 – 1.25 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 1 kHz, −2…3 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0
Mid: 200 – 250 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording10.67 s
Compared segment0:36
Correlation0.228
Peak sharpness (PSR)82.2
Clock drift+30.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR89 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−24.6 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio0.7 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.6 dB
Recording fileRecording_17.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−20.2
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−9.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−9.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−20.1
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−23.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB14.2 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.2 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB10.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance44.3 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges75.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz81.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor98.2 %
SPLloudness contour over time20.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz61.9 %
Overall scoreweighted combination683 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −6.2 dB · significant, match 36%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.3 dB · excellent, match 95%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −2.1 dB · small, match 71%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.3 dB
RMS L / R−24.6 / −23.3 dB
Peak L / R−10.6 / −9.7 dB
L/R correlation0.321
L/R delay+0.36 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −14.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −12.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −8.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −3.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +0.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −1.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +2.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.3 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.3 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −1.8 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.8 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility 0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.8 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +2.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.4 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −0.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.6 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −9.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −23.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.