New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000154
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 09:40
Participant: Андрей Lepilla кустом
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 807 / 1000
Tonal balance258 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity145 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape144 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics131 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour94 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness35 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
96.1 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamic range
preserved
Slight midrange boost
250 – 630 Hz (up to +4.4 dB)
Slight dip
3.15 – 6.3 kHz (up to −3.8 dB)
Slight midrange boost
1.6 – 2.5 kHz (up to +4.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +0.4 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.5 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +1.3 dB slightly higher
Highs 4k–18 kHz −1.6 dB slightly lower

Additional metrics

Band similarity86.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)72.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.8 %
Dynamic similarity87.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)35.4 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score807 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 250 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 400 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
High: 3.15 – 6.3 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 5 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Mid: 1.6 – 2.5 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 2 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.7 – 2.5
Low: 100 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −2…3 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5
Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.452
Track start in the recording1.50 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.555
Peak sharpness (PSR)100.6
Clock drift+31.4 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−63.9 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio46.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.27Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+1.1 dB
Recording file20261109_123649.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−14.8
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−0.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−0.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−10.7
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−17.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB16.7 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB6.1 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB11.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance96.1 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges86.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz72.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor87.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz35.4 %
Overall scoreweighted combination807 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 94%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +1.3 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −1.6 dB · small, match 77%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−3.4 dB
RMS L / R−19.4 / −16.0 dB
Peak L / R−0.9 / −0.7 dB
L/R correlation0.625
L/R delay+0.27 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −5.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −0.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.4 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.4 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +2.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body 0.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −2.7 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +4.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −2.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +2.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +3.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.9 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −3.6 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −2.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −2.6 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +0.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −1.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −0.5 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −0.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −3.6 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.