New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000356
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 14:51
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 713 / 1000
Tonal balance262 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity156 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape121 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics51 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour97 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness26 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.9 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
80.6 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
natural overall
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong bass excess
50 – 125 Hz (up to +5.9 dB)
Dip in the region
160 – 200 Hz (up to −6.1 dB)
Strong treble excess
12 – 16 kHz (up to +6.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −1.1 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.1 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.9 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity87.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)78.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)97.1 %
Dynamic similarity33.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)26.2 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score713 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 50 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0
Low: 160 – 200 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 200 Hz, +3…6 dB, Q = 2.1 – 3.2
High: 12 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 16 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 3.3 – 5.0
Mid: 250 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 315 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Summary
The system sounds good. A light EQ touch-up is enough for a perfect match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.452
Track start in the recording3.08 s
Compared segment3:21
Correlation0.527
Peak sharpness (PSR)47.4
Clock drift+23.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−51.2 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio30.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.26Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.1 dB
Recording fileГолос 261110_143414.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.6−18.0
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB−0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.4 dBTP−0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−6.8−15.7
RMSaverage power−12.9 dB−21.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average12.3 dB21.1 dB
LRAloudness range8.3 dB6.2 dB
DRdynamic range6.9 dB12.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance80.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges87.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz78.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor33.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time97.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz26.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination713 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.9 dB · excellent, match 86%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−2.9 dB
RMS L / R−22.8 / −19.9 dB
Peak L / R−0.1 / −2.2 dB
L/R correlation0.397
L/R delay+0.40 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−3.5 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −7.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −11.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −5.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +2.7 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +5.2 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.5 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +2.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −4.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −4.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” 0.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +3.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +0.4 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +2.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.9 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.1 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.0 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.9 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +4.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −4.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.