New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000015
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 09:41
Car: Kia rio 3
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 701 / 1000
Tonal balance214 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity133 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape121 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics64 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour92 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness77 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.4 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
80.5 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −10.4 dB)
Strong treble excess
3.15 – 8 kHz (up to +5.2 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 125 Hz (up to +6.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −8.6 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +1.6 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.0 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity71.4 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)66.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)91.9 %
Dynamic similarity42.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)77.3 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score701 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
High: 3.15 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
Sub: below 50 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 50 Hz, +4…5 dB, Q = 0.7

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 2 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 160 – 200 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.853
Track start in the recording2.76 s
Compared segment3:57
Correlation0.168
Peak sharpness (PSR)76.2
Clock drift+22.8 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−55.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio36.1 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.38Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.8 dB
Recording fileЗапись 1 (00f04574-2b2d-4e45-a503-06bb48ef8f10).wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−16.8
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−3.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.5 dBTP−3.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.3−14.3
RMSaverage power−13.2 dB−19.3 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB16.3 dB
LRAloudness range9.5 dB5.9 dB
DRdynamic range7.7 dB11.4 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance80.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges71.4 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz66.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor42.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time91.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz77.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination701 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −8.6 dB · significant, match 24%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +1.6 dB · small, match 77%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.0 dB · excellent, match 85%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.0 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −29.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −19.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −13.2 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −3.9 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +4.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −0.4 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −3.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +0.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body 0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +2.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −3.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.6 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −2.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence 0.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +3.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +5.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +3.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −6.9 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −1.4 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −7.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −10.0 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.