New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000223
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 09.11.2026 20:02
Participant: Фёдор
Car: Mitsubishi outlander
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 792 / 1000
Tonal balance220 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity162 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape139 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics112 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour97 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness62 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.7 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
92.7 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
above 5 kHz (up to −10.4 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +5.6 dB)
Slight sub-bass excess
40 – 63 Hz (up to +4.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −1.2 dB slightly lower
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.4 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.3 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −4.3 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity73.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)81.0 %
SPL (loudness contour)97.1 %
Dynamic similarity74.8 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)61.7 %
Stereo stage width52 %
Overall score792 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 10 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 5 kHz)
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 1.1 – 1.7
Sub: 40 – 63 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 50 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9
Mid: 500 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 2.6 – 3.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 2 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the highs for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.551
Track start in the recording5.19 s
Compared segment2:01
Correlation0.064
Peak sharpness (PSR)131.9
Clock drift−16.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−59.0 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio38.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.06Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+8.1 dB
Recording fileЗапись сыпь.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−17.9
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−4.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−4.0 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−15.0
RMSaverage power−13.8 dB−20.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.8 dB16.5 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB11.3 dB
DRdynamic range8.3 dB10.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance92.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges73.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz81.0 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor74.8 %
SPLloudness contour over time97.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz61.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination792 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −1.2 dB · small, match 82%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.4 dB · small, match 67%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.3 dB · excellent, match 96%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −4.3 dB · noticeable, match 49%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.4 dB
RMS L / R−20.4 / −20.7 dB
Peak L / R−4.0 / −4.1 dB
L/R correlation0.929
L/R delay−0.04 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −16.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −10.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −6.7 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +1.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +4.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +5.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −1.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −3.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.1 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.7 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −3.0 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −0.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +3.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −4.1 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −6.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −9.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −7.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −33.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.