New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000374
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 19:18
Participant: Ev
Car: L
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 775 / 1000
Tonal balance234 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity167 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape130 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics64 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour96 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness84 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
12.9 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
86.6 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong bass excess
80 – 200 Hz (up to +5.6 dB)
Slight bass excess
50 – 80 Hz (up to +3.7 dB)
Slight dip
3.15 – 5 kHz (up to −3.8 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −3.5 dB reduced
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.2 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz 0.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.1 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity78.0 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)83.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)95.9 %
Dynamic similarity42.6 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)83.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score775 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 80 – 200 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Low: 50 – 80 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4
High: 3.15 – 5 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 4 kHz, +2…3 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 3.15 – 5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass and mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.450
Track start in the recording1.51 s
Compared segment2:00
Correlation0.557
Peak sharpness (PSR)367.8
Clock drift+0.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−59.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio37.2 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.34Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+9.4 dB
Recording file20261110_221311.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.4−19.1
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB−3.7 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.5 dBTP−3.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.0−16.4
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−22.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.1 dB18.4 dB
LRAloudness range8.6 dB6.1 dB
DRdynamic range7.2 dB12.9 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance86.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges78.0 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz83.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor42.6 %
SPLloudness contour over time95.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz83.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination775 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −3.5 dB · noticeable, match 56%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.2 dB · noticeable, match 59%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: 0.0 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 98%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.6 dB
RMS L / R−21.8 / −22.4 dB
Peak L / R−3.7 / −3.7 dB
L/R correlation0.578
L/R delay+0.10 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.3 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −9.7 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −10.5 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −6.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −0.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +3.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.3 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.3 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.6 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +3.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −1.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.1 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body 0.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +0.3 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.8 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −1.3 dB
2 kHz Presence peak 0.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +1.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.9 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.6 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.2 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +0.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −5.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.