New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000308
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 12:10
Car: Honda cr-v. 3way.
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 654 / 1000
Tonal balance160 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity129 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape100 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics99 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour89 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness77 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.7 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
66.4 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 100 Hz (up to −25.7 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −22.5 dB)
Strong midrange boost
125 – 630 Hz (up to +7.5 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −22.8 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −1.3 dB slightly lower
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −6.7 dB strong dip

Additional metrics

Band similarity53.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.6 %
SPL (loudness contour)89.4 %
Dynamic similarity66.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)77.0 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score654 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 100 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 100 Hz, +10…11 dB, Q = 0.7
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +9…10 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Mid: 125 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.7
Mid: 1.25 – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 1.5 – 2.3

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.852
Track start in the recording5.74 s
Compared segment2:11
Correlation0.633
Peak sharpness (PSR)122.7
Clock drift+21.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−63.8 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio40.7 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: +0.03Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.8 dB
Recording file10 нояб., 20.07​.mp3

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−20.3
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.5 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.5 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−16.5
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−23.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB20.6 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB7.0 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance66.4 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges53.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.6 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor66.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time89.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz77.0 %
Overall scoreweighted combination654 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −22.8 dB · significant, match 2%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −1.3 dB · small, match 81%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 97%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −6.7 dB · significant, match 33%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.0 dB
RMS L / R−23.6 / −22.6 dB
Peak L / R−2.8 / −2.5 dB
L/R correlation0.638
L/R delay−0.32 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −18.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −22.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −26.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −19.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −13.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.8 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −0.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +4.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +4.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +2.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +4.4 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +2.0 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −0.0 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +4.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.6 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −5.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −6.5 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +1.1 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.8 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −1.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −2.6 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −21.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −10.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −9.8 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −20.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.