New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000263
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:03
Date: 10.11.2026 07:37
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 597 / 1000
Tonal balance154 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity129 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape106 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics59 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour80 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness69 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
11.7 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
70.5 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamics expanded
probably due to noise or cabin resonances
Strong bass excess
below 200 Hz (up to +14.2 dB)
Dip in the region
400 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −8.3 dB)
Dip in the region
1.6 – 2.5 kHz (up to −5.7 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +9.2 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +6.0 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −2.2 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +1.5 dB slightly higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity51.2 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)64.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)80.5 %
Dynamic similarity39.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)68.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score597 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 200 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 200 Hz, −6…11 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 400 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 630 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Mid: 1.6 – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 2 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7
High: 12 – 16 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 16 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.6 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:01.851
Track start in the recording3.77 s
Compared segment2:01
Correlation0.417
Peak sharpness (PSR)72.0
Clock drift+18.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−50.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio32.6 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.35Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+10.0 dB
Recording fileГолос 261110_092559.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.6−17.5
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB0.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP0.2 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−14.9
RMSaverage power−13.7 dB−18.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.7 dB18.3 dB
LRAloudness range10.9 dB7.6 dB
DRdynamic range8.3 dB11.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance70.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges51.2 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz64.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor39.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time80.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz68.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination597 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +9.2 dB · significant, match 22%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +6.0 dB · noticeable, match 37%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −2.2 dB · small, match 69%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +1.5 dB · small, match 78%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−5.7 dB
RMS L / R−21.9 / −16.2 dB
Peak L / R−3.6 / 0.2 dB
L/R correlation0.562
L/R delay−1.00 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−6.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −8.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −4.2 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +4.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +14.1 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +13.5 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +9.5 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +3.1 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +3.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.9 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −0.0 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.1 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −5.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −6.4 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −2.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −4.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −2.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.1 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −5.1 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −3.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +2.0 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +3.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +1.7 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.3 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +1.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +5.3 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −5.8 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.