New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000367
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 17:38
Participant: Negoday
Car: Lc200
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 588 / 1000
Tonal balance173 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity108 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape106 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics101 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour76 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness24 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.7 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
70.8 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong treble excess
above 6.3 kHz (up to +18.4 dB)
Dip in the region
1 – 2.5 kHz (up to −7.9 dB)
Strong bass excess
80 – 160 Hz (up to +6.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +5.8 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +2.9 dB slightly higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.3 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +4.1 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity57.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)53.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)76.4 %
Dynamic similarity67.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)23.8 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score588 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: above 6.3 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 6.3 kHz, −6…12 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 1 – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.6
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −4…6 dB, Q = 1.2 – 1.8
High: 3.15 – 6.3 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 4 kHz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.6

Check the crossovers and phase at 1 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording1.31 s
Compared segment2:04
Correlation0.489
Peak sharpness (PSR)140.0
Clock drift+5.9 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−34.4 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.59Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+15.4 dB
Recording fileRecord-13.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−26.2
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−8.6 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−8.6 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−22.7
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−28.4 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB19.7 dB
LRAloudness range5.9 dB7.3 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance70.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges57.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz53.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor67.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time76.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz23.8 %
Overall scoreweighted combination588 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +5.8 dB · noticeable, match 38%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +2.9 dB · small, match 62%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.3 dB · small, match 80%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +4.1 dB · noticeable, match 50%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +29.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +12.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +7.6 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +4.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +5.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +6.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +5.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +1.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −0.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.4 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +4.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −5.7 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.9 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −4.9 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −7.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −5.7 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.2 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.1 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.9 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −4.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +10.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +18.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.7 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +4.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +11.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.