New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000354
LogicVer = 1
IOWA
Простая песня
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:24
Date: 10.11.2026 14:39
Participant: Negoday
Car: Lc200
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 639 / 1000
Tonal balance238 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity83 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape130 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics54 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour84 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness50 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
10.2 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
86.7 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization97 %
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
1.25 – 20 kHz (up to −11.8 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 630 Hz (up to +6.7 dB)
Dip in the region
50 – 80 Hz (up to −5.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −0.2 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +0.8 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.1 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −6.6 dB strong dip

Additional metrics

Band similarity79.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)41.5 %
SPL (loudness contour)84.1 %
Dynamic similarity36.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)49.7 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score639 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 1.25 – 20 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 5 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.3
Mid: 200 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 400 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Low: 50 – 80 Hz
Raise the level:
PEQ 63 Hz, +3…5 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.252
Track start in the recording0.49 s
Compared segment2:02
Correlation0.455
Peak sharpness (PSR)43.1
Clock drift+25.2 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR97 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−23.9 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.81Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+3.8 dB
Recording file20261110_173024.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−10.5−13.0
Peakmax sample level−0.6 dB−0.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.5 dBTP−0.7 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−7.0−10.7
RMSaverage power−13.8 dB−15.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average13.2 dB14.7 dB
LRAloudness range8.6 dB3.2 dB
DRdynamic range7.2 dB10.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance86.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges79.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz41.5 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor36.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time84.1 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz49.7 %
Overall scoreweighted combination639 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −0.2 dB · excellent, match 97%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +0.8 dB · excellent, match 88%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.1 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −6.6 dB · significant, match 33%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+3.8 dB
RMS L / R−14.0 / −17.8 dB
Peak L / R−0.8 / −0.8 dB
L/R correlation0.796
L/R delay−0.06 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+2.9 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +0.3 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +1.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −1.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −5.0 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +2.1 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.8 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +2.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body 0.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.4 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +6.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +6.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +5.5 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +3.9 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +2.3 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.4 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence +1.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −7.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −2.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −10.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −7.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −7.0 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −11.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −5.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −5.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −5.3 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.5 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −6.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.