New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000321
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 12:38
Participant: Dgan.
Car: Honda cr-v. 3way.
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 622 / 1000
Tonal balance140 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity125 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape96 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics92 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour91 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness78 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
15.0 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
63.8 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Lack of deep bass
below 125 Hz (up to −26.2 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 8 kHz (up to −21.5 dB)
Dip in the region
1.25 – 2.5 kHz (up to −9.4 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −22.9 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz −3.7 dB reduced
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.5 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −5.8 dB reduced

Additional metrics

Band similarity46.6 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)90.8 %
Dynamic similarity61.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)77.6 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score622 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: below 125 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 125 Hz, +8…9 dB, Q = 0.7
High: above 8 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +8…9 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 8 kHz)
Mid: 1.25 – 2.5 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2
Mid: 630 Hz – 1 kHz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 800 Hz, −3…6 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

Check the crossovers and phase at 1.25 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, highs, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:04.351
Track start in the recording9.24 s
Compared segment2:08
Correlation0.590
Peak sharpness (PSR)146.7
Clock drift+19.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−63.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio38.5 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: +0.13Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.9 dB
Recording file10 нояб., 20.35​.mp3

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.3−21.9
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−3.4 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−3.4 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.6
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−24.9 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB21.5 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB6.9 dB
DRdynamic range12.1 dB15.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance63.8 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges46.6 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor61.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time90.8 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz77.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination622 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −22.9 dB · significant, match 2%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: −3.7 dB · noticeable, match 54%
Bass sounds thin, lacking punch and warmth.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.5 dB · excellent, match 92%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −5.8 dB · noticeable, match 38%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−0.2 dB
RMS L / R−24.9 / −24.8 dB
Peak L / R−3.4 / −3.9 dB
L/R correlation0.432
L/R delay−0.36 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−0.1 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −21.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −26.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −27.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −18.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −13.9 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −2.4 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight −3.0 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch −3.0 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +0.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +0.1 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +3.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +3.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +1.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +5.9 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −7.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −8.2 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.2 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +0.7 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.6 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.4 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −1.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −20.7 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −9.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −9.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −20.4 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.