New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000131
LogicVer = 1
Pink noise
Correlated
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 0:45
Date: 09.11.2026 06:39
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 558 / 1000
Tonal balance206 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity89 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape128 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics135 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness0 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
9.5 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
85.5 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization0 %
Strong background noise — turn off the engine and ventilation, close the windows
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Treble roll-off
1.25 – 20 kHz (up to −10.8 dB)
Strong bass excess
100 – 630 Hz (up to +8.8 dB)
High noise in the recording
SNR ≈ 0.3 dB
Synchronization
low confidence — the result is approximate

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −0.8 dB normal
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.6 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz +0.2 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −6.1 dB strong dip

Additional metrics

Band similarity68.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)44.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity89.7 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)0.2 %
Stereo stage width150 %
Overall score558 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 1.25 – 20 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 5 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.3
Mid: 100 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −4…8 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: highs, mid-bass needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
2 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording28.77 s
Compared segment0:30
Correlation0.000
Peak sharpness (PSR)5.0
Clock drift0.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR0 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−19.0 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio0.3 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.4 dB
Recording fileRecord-8.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−11.3−16.5
Peakmax sample level−0.3 dB−3.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−3.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.2−16.2
RMSaverage power−14.5 dB−18.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average14.2 dB14.9 dB
LRAloudness range0.1 dB0.4 dB
DRdynamic range11.0 dB9.5 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance85.5 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges68.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz44.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor89.7 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz0.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination558 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −0.8 dB · excellent, match 87%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.6 dB · noticeable, match 55%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: +0.2 dB · excellent, match 97%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −6.1 dB · significant, match 36%
Cymbals and “air” lack sparkle; less detail.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+3.4 dB
RMS L / R−17.3 / −20.8 dB
Peak L / R−3.8 / −6.5 dB
L/R correlation0.761
L/R delay+0.25 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+3.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −23.4 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −1.8 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −2.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +0.8 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −0.6 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +3.0 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +8.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +6.0 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +2.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +7.7 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +7.9 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +7.2 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +3.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.6 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +0.5 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.0 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −2.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −6.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −4.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −3.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −8.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −7.8 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −6.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −8.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −6.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −6.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −3.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −4.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −4.5 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.