New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000001
LogicVer = 0
RedPower
Test Track #1 (демо)
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 1:36
Date: 01.11.2026 10:56
Car: LC200
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 503 / 1000
Tonal balance120 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity90 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape63 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics104 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour76 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness50 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
15.2 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
41.7 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGC–
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization92 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
100 – 250 Hz (up to +11.9 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 50 Hz (up to −25.6 dB)
Dip in the region
800 Hz – 3.15 kHz (up to −7.1 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 20–60 Hz −18.5 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +5.4 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −3.1 dB reduced
Highs 4k–16 kHz +3.6 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity40.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)45.2 %
SPL (loudness contour)75.6 %
Dynamic similarity69.3 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)50.3 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score503 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 100 – 250 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 160 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
Sub: below 50 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 50 Hz, +9…10 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 800 Hz – 3.15 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1.6 kHz, +3…5 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.8
High: 4 – 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −4…7 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.4

A narrow deep dip is usually caused by acoustic cancellation (reflections, phase). EQ can't fully fill it, so don't boost more than +3…4 dB.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, mid-bass, highs, mids needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.252
Track start in the recording2.14 s
Compared segment1:35
Correlation0.660
Peak sharpness (PSR)30.3
Clock drift−44.7 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR92 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−67.3 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio35.5 dB
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+16.5 dB
Recording fileИкст.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−18.6−29.9
Peakmax sample level−1.0 dB−12.2 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction−0.8 dBTP−12.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−18.0−28.3
RMSaverage power−19.7 dB−31.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average18.7 dB19.7 dB
LRAloudness range0.8 dB2.5 dB
DRdynamic range15.0 dB15.2 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance41.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges40.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz45.2 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor69.3 %
SPLloudness contour over time75.6 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz50.3 %
Overall scoreweighted combination503 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 20–60 Hz: −18.5 dB · significant, match 5%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +5.4 dB · noticeable, match 41%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −3.1 dB · noticeable, match 60%
Vocals and instruments may sound distant, “recessed”.
Highs 4k–16 kHz: +3.6 dB · noticeable, match 55%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −16.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −24.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −26.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −7.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +0.1 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth −0.6 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +8.7 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +11.3 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +8.5 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +4.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +1.8 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +0.3 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −2.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −10.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −1.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −3.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −4.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −3.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −7.1 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −3.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +4.0 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +9.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +4.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +3.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.8 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +1.9 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −2.9 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 20 Hz – 20 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.