New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000233
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 09.11.2026 21:45
Participant: ЮРИЙ Ц.
Car: Vesta sw
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 816 / 1000
Tonal balance233 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity162 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape140 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics103 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour93 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness85 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.0 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
93.6 %
(high)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCPossible
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 125 Hz (up to +8.2 dB)
Treble roll-off
above 10 kHz (up to −7.4 dB)
Slight treble excess
5 – 6.3 kHz (up to +4.0 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +2.8 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.1 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.7 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity77.7 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)80.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)93.3 %
Dynamic similarity68.9 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)84.6 %
Stereo stage width115 %
Overall score816 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
High: above 10 kHz
Add brightness if needed:
PEQ 12 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.0 (or HSF 10 kHz)
High: 5 – 6.3 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 5 kHz, −2…4 dB, Q = 2.9 – 4.4

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

A roll-off above 14–16 kHz may be a trait of the phone microphone; correct the highs carefully, by ear.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.450
Track start in the recording2.40 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation0.393
Peak sharpness (PSR)327.1
Clock drift−5.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−50.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio29.0 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.34Possible
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+6.6 dB
Recording file20261110_003815.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−20.1
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−2.9 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−2.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−17.5
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−21.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB18.8 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB4.1 dB
DRdynamic range12.2 dB14.0 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance93.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges77.7 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz80.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor68.9 %
SPLloudness contour over time93.3 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz84.6 %
Overall scoreweighted combination816 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +2.8 dB · small, match 63%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.1 dB · noticeable, match 60%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.0 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.9 dB
RMS L / R−21.3 / −22.2 dB
Peak L / R−3.0 / −2.9 dB
L/R correlation0.839
L/R delay−0.02 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.9 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −4.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −3.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −2.0 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +7.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +4.8 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +7.4 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.9 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +2.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −1.0 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +2.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.7 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +0.7 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.4 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −0.6 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.7 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −1.5 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.0 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −0.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −0.4 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −1.5 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +3.8 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +0.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +2.1 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −2.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air −2.8 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −6.1 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −9.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.