New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000272
LogicVer = 1
Chen ning
Question
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 2:12
Date: 10.11.2026 08:57
Participant: OknehcakT
Car: Forester sg5
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 687 / 1000
Tonal balance208 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity123 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape128 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics107 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour86 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness35 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
14.7 dB
(good)
Spectral similarity
85.4 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %
Noticeable background noise
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Dip in the region
500 Hz – 1.25 kHz (up to −10.5 dB)
Strong midrange boost
200 – 400 Hz (up to +9.5 dB)
Strong sub-bass excess
below 63 Hz (up to +8.3 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +4.8 dB noticeably higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.4 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.1 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +0.4 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity69.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)61.7 %
SPL (loudness contour)86.5 %
Dynamic similarity71.1 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)35.2 %
Stereo stage width139 %
Overall score687 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Mid: 500 Hz – 1.25 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 800 Hz, +5…6 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.3
Mid: 200 – 400 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 250 Hz, −5…9 dB, Q = 1.0 – 1.6
Sub: below 63 Hz
Lower the level:
LSF 63 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7
Low: 80 – 160 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 125 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9

Check the crossovers and phase at 3.15 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the sub-bass and mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.251
Track start in the recording2.80 s
Compared segment2:12
Correlation−0.011
Peak sharpness (PSR)269.3
Clock drift+11.6 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−36.7 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio10.8 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.38Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+11.9 dB
Recording file261110_205332 333.m4a

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−15.4−24.0
Peakmax sample level−0.0 dB−4.8 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.6 dBTP−4.8 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−11.5−20.8
RMSaverage power−17.8 dB−25.8 dB
Crest factorpeak / average17.8 dB21.1 dB
LRAloudness range5.8 dB5.4 dB
DRdynamic range12.3 dB14.7 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance85.4 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges69.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz61.7 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor71.1 %
SPLloudness contour over time86.5 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz35.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination687 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +4.8 dB · noticeable, match 45%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.4 dB · noticeable, match 56%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +0.4 dB · excellent, match 93%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance−1.0 dB
RMS L / R−26.4 / −25.4 dB
Peak L / R−4.8 / −7.1 dB
L/R correlation0.773
L/R delay+0.29 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original−1.0 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −2.9 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −7.0 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +1.3 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +8.3 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +2.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +1.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +2.2 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.7 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +2.7 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +6.6 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +8.3 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +8.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −0.0 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −0.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −4.7 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −5.8 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −9.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −6.3 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +0.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.4 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity +0.8 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −2.8 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +0.2 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance −0.9 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +1.5 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +1.6 dB
12 kHz Ultra air 0.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +2.7 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −0.3 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.