New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000033
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 07.11.2026 18:13
Car: —
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 429 / 1000
Tonal balance120 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity126 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape55 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics128 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour0 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness0 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
36.6 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
Low
Recording qualityPoor
Phone AGCCan't tell
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization0 %
The recording contains a lot of extraneous sounds or distortion
Low synchronization confidence — check the track and record it again in full

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 315 Hz (up to +20.3 dB)
Strong treble excess
above 8 kHz (up to +19.4 dB)
Dip in the region
630 Hz – 2 kHz (up to −10.4 dB)
Synchronization
low confidence — the result is approximate

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +7.8 dB strong excess
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +12.7 dB strong excess
Mids 250–4 kHz −1.6 dB slightly lower
Highs 4k–18 kHz +4.8 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity40.1 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)62.9 %
SPL (loudness contour)0.0 %
Dynamic similarity85.4 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)0.2 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score429 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 315 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −8…12 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.5
High: above 8 kHz
Reduce harshness:
HSF 8 kHz, −8…12 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 630 Hz – 2 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 1 kHz, +4…6 dB, Q = 0.6 – 0.9
Mid: 2.5 – 4 kHz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 3.15 kHz, +3…6 dB, Q = 1.8 – 2.7

Check the crossovers and phase at 2.5 – 4 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

Summary
The sound differs substantially from the original. Check speaker wiring and polarity, crossover and EQ settings, then measure again.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:52.257
Track start in the recording2.75 s
Compared segment0:45
Correlation0.000
Peak sharpness (PSR)5.8
Clock drift0.0 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR0 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−64.5 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio48.8 dB
Phone AGCthe track has few loudness changesCan't tell
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+14.0 dB
Recording fileМоя запись 2.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.2−14.3
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−4.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−3.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−8.0−13.8
RMSaverage power−11.8 dB−15.7 dB
Crest factorpeak / average11.8 dB11.7 dB
LRAloudness range1.8 dB0.9 dB
DRdynamic range8.0 dB8.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance36.6 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges40.1 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz62.9 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor85.4 %
SPLloudness contour over time0.0 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz0.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination429 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +7.8 dB · significant, match 27%
Deep bass may feel heavier or boomier.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +12.7 dB · significant, match 12%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −1.6 dB · small, match 76%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +4.8 dB · noticeable, match 45%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub +0.6 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension +8.3 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body +10.1 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +5.6 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +9.8 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +17.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +18.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +16.5 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body +9.6 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +4.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +12.4 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body +1.5 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.1 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +1.5 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −7.8 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body −10.2 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −4.4 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −3.0 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −3.6 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +1.0 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.3 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence −6.6 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −2.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −0.1 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +1.2 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.0 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +5.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +10.0 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +19.2 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +12.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.