New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000342
LogicVer = 1
Graham Blvd
After Dark
Source: WAV 44.1 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 3:47
Date: 10.11.2026 13:30
Participant: KAPITAN
Car: TOYOTA WISH/RP 750
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 673 / 1000
Tonal balance181 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity122 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape79 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics121 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour95 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness75 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.3 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
52.7 %
(low)
Analysis reliability
High
Recording qualityGood
Phone AGCNot detected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization94 %

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
noticeably off
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong treble excess
3.15 – 20 kHz (up to +7.7 dB)
Lack of deep bass
below 63 Hz (up to −20.5 dB)
Dip in the region
315 – 630 Hz (up to −5.2 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz −14.8 dB strong dip
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz 0.0 dB normal
Mids 250–4 kHz −0.7 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz +4.9 dB noticeably higher

Additional metrics

Band similarity60.3 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)60.8 %
SPL (loudness contour)95.4 %
Dynamic similarity80.5 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)74.8 %
Stereo stage width–
Overall score673 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
High: 3.15 – 20 kHz
Reduce harshness:
PEQ 8 kHz, −3…6 dB, Q = 0.5 – 0.6
Sub: below 63 Hz
Raise the level:
LSF 63 Hz, +7…8 dB, Q = 0.7
Mid: 315 – 630 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 500 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 1.3 – 1.9
Low: 80 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 100 Hz, −2…4 dB, Q = 1.4 – 2.2

Check the crossovers and phase at 2 – 2.5 kHz. Make sure mids and highs sum correctly; adjust the delays if needed.

A dip at 315 – 630 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The sound differs noticeably from the original: sub-bass, highs needs tuning. DSP correction is recommended.
Recommended
correction
4 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.250
Track start in the recording3.22 s
Compared segment3:43
Correlation0.319
Peak sharpness (PSR)390.7
Clock drift+0.3 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR94 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorfrom the lead-in before the track−63.4 dB
SNRsignal-to-noise ratio48.3 dB
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.11Not detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+4.8 dB
Recording fileWISH RP TEST.wav

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−9.1−12.4
Peakmax sample level−0.4 dB−3.0 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction1.8 dBTP−1.9 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−6.8−10.4
RMSaverage power−11.3 dB−15.1 dB
Crest factorpeak / average10.9 dB12.1 dB
LRAloudness range3.6 dB2.9 dB
DRdynamic range6.8 dB8.3 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance52.7 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges60.3 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz60.8 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor80.5 %
SPLloudness contour over time95.4 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz74.8 %
Overall scoreweighted combination673 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: −14.8 dB · significant, match 9%
The bass lacks depth and “pressure”.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: 0.0 dB · excellent, match 100%
Close to the original.
Mids 250–4 kHz: −0.7 dB · excellent, match 89%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: +4.9 dB · noticeable, match 44%
Highs may sound harsh; sibilants and cymbals may be piercing.

Stereo analysis

The recording is mono, so stereo analysis is unavailable. This is normal for most voice recorders.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −12.1 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −15.6 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −20.4 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation −9.2 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom −3.7 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +3.4 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +3.6 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +1.9 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −6.2 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids +1.2 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” +4.5 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body 0.0 dB
400 Hz Lower presence −2.3 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body −5.2 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility −1.2 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body +2.1 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −1.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack −0.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity −2.2 dB
2 kHz Presence peak −1.6 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −3.5 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +3.2 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity +5.3 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance +6.3 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +5.8 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer +3.4 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail +4.2 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +2.6 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit +7.0 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited +5.7 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.