New analysis Leaderboard
Upgrade your system with our products redpower.ru/autosound →
Sound analysis report
Report No. 000097
LogicVer = 1
СДП
Сыпь,гармоника
Source: WAV 48 kHz / 16 bit Duration: 4:00
Date: 08.11.2026 15:24
Car: Accent/sq
Microphone: Phone (built-in)
Overall quality
Total: 721 / 1000
Tonal balance255 / 300
level match of Sub / Mid-bass / Mid / High
Clarity173 / 200
FR accuracy in the 1–5 kHz region
FR shape135 / 150
1/3-octave spectrum correlation
Dynamics43 / 150
preservation of LRA and crest factor
Loudness contour81 / 100
how loudness follows the original
Signal cleanness34 / 100
coherence: share of signal without distortion and noise
Dynamics (DR)
8.6 dB
(average)
Spectral similarity
89.9 %
(medium)
Analysis reliability
Medium
Recording qualityFair
Phone AGCDetected
Clipping0.0 %
Synchronization100 %
The recording contains extraneous sounds or distortion
The phone adjusted the level automatically (AGC), so dynamics and SPL are distorted; use the “Music” / unprocessed mode in the recorder app

FR (frequency response)

Reference (original)Your recording
Deviation (Your recording − Reference)

Key findings

Tonal balance
moderately shifted
Dynamic range
preserved
Strong bass excess
40 – 125 Hz (up to +7.8 dB)
Slight dip
160 – 400 Hz (up to −4.5 dB)
Strong midrange boost
400 – 630 Hz (up to +5.9 dB)

Bands (deviation from the original)

RangeDeviationRating
Sub 40–60 Hz +1.1 dB slightly higher
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz +3.2 dB noticeably higher
Mids 250–4 kHz 0.0 dB normal
Highs 4k–18 kHz −0.1 dB normal

Additional metrics

Band similarity84.9 %
Clarity (1–5 kHz)86.3 %
SPL (loudness contour)80.9 %
Dynamic similarity29.0 %
Signal cleanness (coherence)34.2 %
Stereo stage width118 %
Overall score721 / 1000
DSP tuning recommendations
Low: 40 – 125 Hz
Lower the level:
PEQ 80 Hz, −4…7 dB, Q = 0.7 – 1.1
Mid: 160 – 400 Hz
Compensate the dip:
PEQ 250 Hz, +2…4 dB, Q = 0.9 – 1.4
Mid: 400 – 630 Hz
Reduce the peak:
PEQ 500 Hz, −3…5 dB, Q = 2.3 – 3.5

A dip at 160 – 400 Hz is often a phase issue at the mid-bass/midrange crossover: try inverting the mid-bass polarity or adjusting the delays.

Part of the bass rise is due to natural cabin gain; many people deliberately keep a small +2…4 dB excess.

Summary
The system sounds good but needs correction in the mid-bass for a closer match to the original.
Recommended
correction
3 PEQ

Detailed report

Synchronization

Position in the original0:00.939
Track start in the recording0.55 s
Compared segment1:10
Correlation0.292
Peak sharpness (PSR)29.0
Clock drift−65.5 ppm
Confidenceshare of confirmed segments, weighted by PSR100 %

Recording integrity

Clippingshare of samples at full scale0.00 %
Noise floorestimated from quiet passages−22.1 dB
SNRneeds a 1–2 s pause before the track starts–
Phone AGClevel slope “recording − original”: −0.70Detected
Level alignmentLUFS + FR median+0.5 dB
Recording fileVID20261108182003.mp4

Loudness metrics

MetricOriginalRecording
LUFSperceived loudness−12.2−11.5
Peakmax sample level0.0 dB−0.1 dB
True Peakpeak after reconstruction0.1 dBTP−0.1 dBTP
ST-LUFS maxloudest 3 s window−9.0−9.3
RMSaverage power−15.2 dB−13.5 dB
Crest factorpeak / average15.2 dB13.4 dB
LRAloudness range10.6 dB4.1 dB
DRdynamic range8.9 dB8.6 dB

Similarity scores

Spectralcloseness of frequency balance89.9 %
By bandsmatch in the main ranges84.9 %
Claritypresence bands 1–5 kHz86.3 %
DynamicLRA and crest factor29.0 %
SPLloudness contour over time80.9 %
Signal cleannesscoherence 200 Hz–5 kHz34.2 %
Overall scoreweighted combination721 / 1000

What you may hear

Sub 40–60 Hz: +1.1 dB · small, match 83%
Close to the original.
Mid-bass 60–250 Hz: +3.2 dB · noticeable, match 59%
Mid-bass may sound thick or “boxy”.
Mids 250–4 kHz: 0.0 dB · excellent, match 99%
Close to the original.
Highs 4k–18 kHz: −0.1 dB · excellent, match 98%
Close to the original.

Stereo analysis

L/R balance+0.4 dB
RMS L / R−13.3 / −13.7 dB
Peak L / R−0.2 / −0.1 dB
L/R correlation0.763
L/R delay+0.04 ms
Polarityin phase
Balance shift vs original+0.4 dB

Stereo figures describe the channels of the recording file, not the absolute stereo stage of the cabin.

1/3-octave detail

Excellent · |Δ| < 1 dB Small · 1–3 dB Noticeable · 3–6 dB Significant · > 6 dB Outside the analysis range
FrequencyRegionΔ
25 Hz Infra / very deep sub −0.2 dB
32 Hz Deep sub extension −4.4 dB
40 Hz Deep sub body −2.8 dB
50 Hz Sub foundation +5.0 dB
63 Hz Upper sub / boom +5.3 dB
80 Hz Lower mid-bass, warmth +7.7 dB
100 Hz Mid-bass weight +5.1 dB
125 Hz Main mid-bass punch +4.4 dB
160 Hz Upper mid-bass body −1.1 dB
200 Hz Transition to lower mids −2.5 dB
250 Hz Low vocals / “boxiness” −3.2 dB
315 Hz Male vocal body −3.6 dB
400 Hz Lower presence +1.9 dB
500 Hz Vocal / guitar body +5.3 dB
630 Hz Speech intelligibility +0.1 dB
800 Hz Upper vocal body 0.0 dB
1 kHz Vocal presence −0.8 dB
1.25 kHz Presence / attack +0.1 dB
1.6 kHz Edge of clarity +1.8 dB
2 kHz Presence peak +0.3 dB
2.5 kHz Consonant clarity −1.7 dB
3.15 kHz Hard presence +0.4 dB
4 kHz Attack and clarity −0.2 dB
5 kHz Definition / start of sibilance −1.9 dB
6.3 kHz Brilliance +3.5 dB
8 kHz Air / cymbal shimmer −0.3 dB
10 kHz Air and fine detail −0.3 dB
12 kHz Ultra air +0.9 dB
16 kHz Top-end edge / often the mic limit −2.4 dB
20 kHz Ultrasonic edge / often limited −58.2 dB
A relative comparison of a phone recording after synchronization and level alignment, not a laboratory frequency response measurement. The phone microphone and its processing affect the result, so the analysis covers only 40 Hz – 18 kHz. EQ recommendations are a starting point: verify changes by ear and with a repeat measurement.